Moving Away From Qualitative vs Quantitative Research

Qual / Quant research was the gold standard for basing branding and marketing strategies for decades. It’s still in every university course, textbook, etc. 

Today, the once-revered Qual / Quant methodologies are increasingly seen as too cumbersome, costly, and time-consuming for most companies on the market, especially in light of recent economic downturns. So what’s coming in to replace them?

Quick recap of Qual / Quant

Market research, surveys, focus groups, etc. are very effective in gaining an in-depth understanding of the target market, target audience(s) and behaviours. Despite being effective, these methods are often inaccessible and cumbersome for startups. Any Qual / Quant research process worth its salt needs time and money (a lot of it) and, increasingly, most companies are reluctant to budget for this.

Internal exploration

So what are brands using instead? The focus has shifted to leveraging internal expertise and knowledge. This way, companies can develop a more authentic and direct understanding of their brand's identity and values, mapping out a way to communicate it effectively.

Target audience knowledge & product/market fit

Deep, nuanced understanding of a specific segment, direct communication with it has emerged as a more effective strategy than broad data sweeps popular in the past. By matching a company’s identity and values with the specific needs of a particular segment, you can create a basis for an ongoing relationship with your target audience. 

This responsive approach to brand and product building is more effective in establishing product / market fit and winning brand / marketing strategies than the slow process of market research. It also allows for more innovation as people often can’t tell you what they need or what they’re missing until they have it.

Analyze / iterate cycle

Adapting and pivoting effectively is crucial for survival. Βy continuously analyzing market/user feedback and rapidly iterating products or strategies in response, brands can be adaptable and agile. 

Combining old and new approaches

New methodologies are crucial for new landscapes. We can draw on elements of traditional methods (like a data-based, scientific approach, and an open mindset driven by findings and not preconceived notions), but using more cost-effective and time-saving methods of brand building is quickly becoming the new gold standard.

qualitative vs quantitative research

Moving beyond traditional Qual / Quant research in branding and marketing

Open up any branding or marketing textbook, and you are practically guaranteed to find a few extensive sections on qualitative and quantitative research. Long revered as the twin pillars of effective decision-making, these methodologies are the bedrock upon which generations of marketers have built their campaigns — and careers. There's a good reason for this. Historically, the rigor of market research, surveys, and focus groups has been undisputed in yielding a comprehensive understanding of market dynamics, audience profiles, and consumer behaviors.

Yet the tides have been shifting. While these methods have an unparalleled depth, they come at a high cost — in terms of finances, resources, and time. In today’s fast-paced and often financially strained environment, the indispensability of Qual / Quant approaches is being reassessed. Many leading strategists, especially in the agile startup world, see them as too expensive and too slow for most contemporary businesses, labeling them as luxuries businesses cannot afford. Beyond their high cost, many question whether these approaches meet the demands of startups and other fast-paced businesses.

The 101 on Qual / Quant research

Traditionally, the way companies approached branding and marketing was through deep looks at the market and the target audience. Qualitative approaches included focus groups and in-depth customer interviews. These techniques offered insights into the target audience’s attitudes, motivations, and emotional connections with brands. Work on these methods was time and resource intensive, often stretching over months. They provided marketers with rich, narrative data that they could use for crafting brand stories.

On the quantitative front, surveys and desk research (aka market analysis) were the most popular approaches. Leveraging large sample sizes, these methods delivered statistically significant data, enabling marketers to identify trends, measure brand awareness, and gauge customer satisfaction. Typically quicker than qualitative methods, surveys could span a few weeks, depending on the scale. The interpretation of these data sets required applying both analytical rigor and creative thinking. 

Marketers interpreted qualitative data by identifying themes and patterns that emerged from consumer narratives, while quantitative data were analyzed through statistical models to make predictive and explanatory inferences. Together, these traditional methods provided a comprehensive view of the market landscape, guiding brands towards comprehensive, but often responsive approaches. 

Adapt/Iterate flowchart
Adapt / Iterate flowchart

The rise of internal exploration and the adapt / iterate cycle

Instead of these traditional methods, brands are turning inwards, harnessing internal expertise and insights. This pivot allows companies to cultivate an organic and sincere comprehension of their own brand identity and values before they start interacting with the market. The internal exploration taps into the knowledge and firsthand experiences of team members, fostering a branding strategy that resonates with authenticity.

The modern strategy focuses on a deep, nuanced understanding of specific market segments and direct communication with them. This approach has proven more effective than broad data sweeps that were once popular. By aligning a company’s core identity and values with the particular needs of a distinct segment, a brand can lay the foundation for a relationship with its target audience.

This proactive approach to brand and product development is more adept at establishing a robust product/market fit and crafting truly unique brands compared to the more careful and responsive approach characteristic of more traditional methods. It also fosters innovation, as consumers often fail to articulate their needs or desires until they are confronted with a solution that fulfills them.

In the current market climate, the ability to adapt and pivot is vital for survival. By continuously analyzing market and user feedback and rapidly iterating products or strategies in response, brands maintain agility and resilience. This cycle of analysis and iteration ensures that products stay relevant and that marketing strategies resonate with the ever-evolving consumer landscape.

Synthesizing old and new approaches

While new methodologies are indispensable for navigating contemporary challenges, there is wisdom in the old ways that can still serve us well. The data-driven, empirical nature of traditional research, combined with an open mindset that prioritizes actual findings over assumptions, remains valuable. 

When analyzing performance or when embarking on quick customer exploration projects, brands do best when they embrace the empirical approaches of traditional research. However, brands also do best when they perform these explorations having already consolidated their own vision, mission, and unique point of view on the market.  

In essence, the future of branding and marketing lies not in discarding the old, but in its synthesis with the new. By drawing on the strengths of Qual / Quant research and combining some elements of it with innovative, agile strategies, brands can stay ahead in a competitive, ever-changing marketplace. This hybrid approach promises the best of both worlds: the reliability of data-driven insights and the agility of engaging your audience directly. 

The shift away from traditional qualitative vs quantitative research towards more agile, internal, and responsive methodologies doesn't signify a rejection of data and empirical insights. Instead, it represents a strategic evolution, ensuring that brands are not only seen and heard but also felt and remembered in a marketplace that values speed, authenticity, and adaptability above all else. 

Interested in more articles related to branding, visual identity, pitching, and web design/development? Check out our resource pages.


How do vision and mission statements impact a company's long-term direction?

Effective vision and mission statements should ideally constitute important tools in formulating a company’s strategy. They should largely remain unchanged through the years, though a significant pivot may bring about new vision and mission statements. Together, they work to define the focus of the business and how it impacts the world. 

The vision statement is a representation of your company’s view of a better world. The mission statement reflects how it sets about to achieve this vision. They work together to create internal alignment and help with strategic decision making. When planning for the future, developing new products, or experimenting with new strategies, teams can perform a quick check against the vision and mission statements to ensure that these initiatives are aligned with the essence of the brand. 

In short, the vision and mission statements are powerful tools which can and should impact decisions across the organizations, making them important factors in a company’s long-term direction.

How does brand strategy influence the overall success of a business?

Your brand strategy reflects how your brand sees the world and its role within it. It is the framework that, ideally, should guide all your communications (both external and internal) and audience touchpoints, i.e. each interaction an audience member has with your business. 

Having standardized communication across all channels and touchpoints makes business processes smoother and positively influences your client relationships, ensuring you develop strong, long-term connections with your customers. It also simplifies strategic decision-making and aligns your team. All these factors are vital to the success of a business.

How do messaging frameworks help communicate your brand message effectively?

Messaging frameworks are structured guides that outline the core messages, value propositions, and differentiators of a brand. They ensure consistency across all communications, from marketing materials and social media posts to customer service interactions. By defining key messages that resonate with the brand's target audiences, messaging frameworks help ensure that a brand’s communications are clear and memorable. 

They also help organizations stay aligned internally and ensure that each member, regardless of their role, understands what the brand’s key message is and how to communicate it effectively. This internal alignment is crucial for presenting a unified brand image to the outside world.

What specific elements contribute to a brand's verbal identity?

A brand’s verbal identity should align your team on how your brand communicates and how this communication changes depending on the situation. It defines a specific and recognizable language through which your brand can deliver its message to your audience or audiences.

Typically, a verbal identity includes some, or all, of the following elements:

Brand personality: This captures the human traits or characteristics that your brand embodies, such as being adventurous, sophisticated, or reliable, which help shape how your brand is perceived.

Brand voice: The brand voice reflects how your brand reflects its personality across all communication channels.

Brand tone: While the brand voice remains consistent, the brand tone can change depending on the context of the message and the audience being addressed, ranging from formal and professional to informal and friendly.

Messaging frameworks: These are strategic tools that outline the key messages your brand intends to communicate to its different target audiences, ensuring that all messaging is aligned with your brand's mission, vision, and value propositions.

Messaging examples: These provide specific examples of how your brand's messaging might be applied in various scenarios.

Style and grammar guidelines: These outline your preferred spelling, grammar, and style, ensuring that your communication is consistent across the board. 

What are some key considerations when developing a tone of voice for a brand?

The first and most important consideration is the brand’s personality. While businesses are functional, they still communicate with people – and people primarily connect with stories and personas. Your brand’s personality will define a set of human characteristics which reflect how it sees itself in the world. By giving your brand these human attributes, you are making it both distinctive and easier to identify with. The tone of voice should reflect your brand’s personality.

It’s also important to consider your target market and your audience’s expectations. While having a distinctive tone of voice is important for memorability, there is such a thing as being too different. If all brands in your segment adopt a serious, professional tone, and you would like to be fun and playful, there is certainly space for that, but consider very carefully why you are doing it.


No items found.


No items found.


No items found.

Get in touch

Inspired? We’d love to connect and explore ways to collaborate.